Why the study?
Does a coupled fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analysis accurately resolve pulse wave velocity and wall shear stress in a normal human thoracic aorta model compared to PC-MRI and rigid wall models?
Does a coupled fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analysis accurately resolve pulse wave velocity and wall shear stress in a normal human thoracic aorta model compared to PC-MRI and rigid wall models?
A coupled fluid-structure interaction numerical model accurately estimates pulse wave velocity and provides more realistic wall shear stress predictions than rigid wall models in the thoracic aorta.
FSI models may refine aortic WSS estimates over rigid assumptions; leaves open clinical adoption pending patient-specific validation.
Aortic dissection and atherosclerosis are highly fatal diseases. The development of both diseases is closely associated with highly complex haemodynamics. Thus, in predicting the onset of cardiac disease, it is desirable to obtain a detailed understanding of the flowfield characteristics in the human cardiovascular circulatory system. Accordingly, in this study, a numerical model of a normal human thoracic aorta is constructed using the geometry information obtained from a phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) technique. The interaction between the blood flow and the vessel wall dynamics is then investigated using a coupled fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analysis. The simulations focus specifically on the flowfield characteristics and pulse wave velocity (PWV) of the blood flow. Instead of using a conventional PC-MRI method to measure PWV, we present an innovative application of using the FSI approach to numerically resolve PWV for the assessment of wall compliance in a thoracic aorta model. The estimated PWV for a normal thoracic aorta agrees well with the results obtained via PC-MRI measurement. In addition, simulations which consider the FSI effect yield a lower predicted value of the wall shear stress at certain locations in the cardiac cycle than models which assume a rigid vessel wall. Consequently, the model provides a suitable basis for the future development of more sophisticated methods capable of performing the computer-aided analysis of aortic blood flows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: