Why the study?
Does thrombolytic therapy improve survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Does thrombolytic therapy improve survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
This review confirms that thrombolytic therapy improves survival in acute myocardial infarction, even when administered up to 24 hours after symptom onset, but highlights the need for head-to-head trials.
Supports thrombolysis up to 24 hours in AMI; leaves open optimal regimens via head-to-head trials.
Large controlled mortality studies with streptokinase, APSAC or tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) have conclusively shown that thrombolytic therapy within 6 hours after symptom onset improves survival after acute myocardial infarction. There is evidence of benefit even for patients treated between 7–24 hours after pain onset, suggesting that early recanalization of the infarct‐related artery is not the only mechanism by which thrombolysis improves survival. There is no apparent upper age limit for thrombolytic therapy. Serious side effects are generally rare and not age dependent. Inclusion criteria as well as concomittant adjuvant therapy were different in the various trials. Furthermore, the 95% confidence intervals for mortality reduction by different thrombolytic agents are overlapping. To evaluate their relative efficacy and safety direct head‐to‐head comparison is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rolf Schröder (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: