Background Microneedling is a promising method for the treatment of acne scars, while the effect of microneedling combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) remains unknown. We performed a meta-analysis of controlled studies to compare the efficacy and safety of microneedling treatment with and without additional PRP in patients with acne scars. Methods Randomized and non-randomized controlled studies were identified by search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane's Library databases. Results were pooled with a random-effects model, incorporating the possible heterogeneity. Results Four randomized and 10 split-face non-randomized controlled studies with 472 patients were included. Compared to microneedling therapy without PRP, combined treatment with microneedling and PRP was associated with increased odds of clinical improvement of >50% in Goodman's qualitative scale [GQS: odds ratio (OR): 2.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.96–4.51,p< 0.001;I2= 0%], and a significantly improved mean GQS score (mean difference: −0.32, 95% CI: −0.44 to −0.20,p< 0.001;I2= 0%). Combined treatment was associated with a higher patient satisfying rate (OR: 4.15, 95% CI: 2.13 to 8.09,p< 0.001;I2= 53%), while the incidence of severe adverse events such as severe erythema (OR: 1.59, 95% CI:.73 to 3.46,P= 0.24;I2= 0%) and severe edema (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.47 to 2.76,P= 0.77;I2= 0%) were not significantly different. Conclusions Combined treatment with microneedling with PRP is more effective than microneedling without PRP for patients with acne scars.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: