Why the study?
Primary angiosarcoma of the cervix is exceptionally rare with only two cases reported worldwide, making microscopic diagnosis difficult and prone to misdiagnosis.
Primary angiosarcoma of the cervix is exceptionally rare and requires immunohistochemistry and genetic testing to distinguish it from other conditions like high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Primary angiosarcomas are a rare type of soft-tissue sarcomas that originate from endothelial cells. These sarcomas can develop in any part of the body and have a poor prognosis. However, they are commonly found in the skin of elderly white men, particularly on the scalp and head region. Primary angiosarcoma of the cervix is exceptionally rare. To date, only two cases of this disease have been reported worldwide. The diagnosis of the disease is difficult microscopically, requiring immunohistochemistry and genetic testing to distinguish. We report a recent case, in which the lesion was preoperatively considered a high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. A 35-year-old woman presented with vaginal bleeding and cervical erosions. A high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma involving the cervix was considered and a modified radical hysterectomy was performed with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and sentinel lymph nodes resection. The gene diagnosis performed by fluorescence in situ hybridization for YWHAE translocation fusion was negative excluding a YWHAE -translocated high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. A primary angiosarcoma of the cervix was finally diagnosed. Primary angiosarcoma of the cervix is rare, and gynecologic pathologists do not know it well, so it is easy to be wrongly considered. Immunohistochemistry and genetic testing help confirm the diagnosis.
Adds third reported case of primary cervical angiosarcoma; leaves optimal diagnosis and management open.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: