Why the study?
Does preload-adjusted PWR(max) accurately measure left ventricular contractility in a beat-to-beat fashion in atrial fibrillation?
Does preload-adjusted PWR(max) accurately measure left ventricular contractility in a beat-to-beat fashion in atrial fibrillation?
Preload-adjusted PWR(max) is a valid, load-independent index of left ventricular contractility in atrial fibrillation that correlates well with invasive E(max).
May enable beat-to-beat LV contractility assessment in AF; animal data leave clinical translation open.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular contractility in atrial fibrillation is known to change in a beat to beat fashion, but there is no gold standard for contractility indices in atrial fibrillation, especially those measured non-invasively. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the non-invasive index of contractility "preload-adjusted PWR(max)" (maximal ventricular power divided by the square of end diastolic volume) can accurately measure left ventricular contractility in a beat to beat fashion in atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Atrial fibrillation was induced experimentally using 60 Hz stimulation of the atrium and maintained in 12 sheep; four received diltiazem, four digoxin, and four no drugs (control). Aortic flow, left ventricular volume, and left ventricular pressure were monitored simultaneously. Preload-adjusted PWR(max), the slope of the end systolic pressure-volume relation (E(max)), and the maximum rate of change of left ventricular pressure (dP/dt(max)) were calculated in a beat to beat fashion. RESULTS: Preload-adjusted PWR(max) correlated linearly with load independent E(max) (p < 0.0001) and curvilinearly with load dependent dP/dt(max) (p < 0.0001), which suggested the load independence of preload-adjusted PWR(max). After five minutes of diltiazem administration, preload-adjusted PWR(max), dP/dt(max), and E(max) fell significantly (p < 0.0001) to 62%, 64%, and 61% of baseline, respectively. Changes were not significant after five minutes of digoxin (103%, 98%, and 102%) or in controls (97%, 96%, and 95%). CONCLUSIONS: Preload-adjusted PWR(max) correlates linearly with E(max) and is a useful measure of contractility even in atrial fibrillation. Non-invasive application of this method, in combination with echocardiography and tonometry, may yield important information for optimising the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masami Takagaki (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: