Comparative validation study reveals assay and prediluent discrepancies in high-purity factor VIII, indicating chromogenic testing with deficient plasma optimizes potency labeling.
The assessment of factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) in recently available highly purified and concentrated FVIII therapeutic products calls for careful evaluation of assay methodologies. We assayed more than 130 batches of a concentrate with a specific activity of about 150 FVIII:C units/mg protein, using one-stage and two-stage clotting and chromogenic methods. There was good agreement between the potency estimates obtained with the different methods. We also compared the FVIII:C potencies obtained after predilution in buffer or FVIII-deficient plasma using either calibrated plasma or FVIII concentrate as references. With the one-stage assay we found a marked discrepancy between the potency values obtained with buffer and with FVII-deficient plasma used as prediluents. In order to validate our "in vitro" data we performed 6 "in vivo" analyses in severe haemophilia A patients. On the basis of the overall data obtained we chose to label FVIII potency by using FVIII-deficient plasma as prediluent, reference plasma as standard and the chromogenic assay method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazurier et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: