Key result
Comorbid breast cancer is not associated with increased mortality in women with heart failure.
Why the study?
HF patients diagnosed with breast cancer may face a higher risk of death and different HF presentation and treatment compared with patients without breast cancer.
Does a concurrent breast cancer diagnosis affect all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in women with heart failure?
Cohort (n=14,998)
Yes
Does a concurrent breast cancer diagnosis affect all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in women with heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 1.04 (95% CI 0.83–1.29)
A concurrent breast cancer diagnosis does not significantly alter the risk of all-cause or cardiovascular mortality in women with heart failure, despite differences in baseline ischemic heart disease and treatments.
AbstractAimsHeart failure (HF) patients diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) may have a higher risk of death, and different HF presentation and treatment than patients without BC.Methods and resultsA total of 14 998 women with incident HF (iHF) or prevalent HF (pHF) enrolled in the Swedish HF Registry within and after 1 month since HF diagnosis, respectively, between 2008 and 2013. Patients were linked with the National Patient-, Cancer-, and Cause-of-Death Registry. Two hundred and ninety-four iHF and 338 pHF patients with BC were age-matched to 1470 iHF and 1690 pHF patients without BC. Comorbidity and treatment characteristics were compared using the χ2 tests for categories. Cox proportional hazard models assessed the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among HF patients with and without BC. In the pHF group, BC patients had less often myocardial infarction (21.6% vs. 28.6%, P < 0.01) and received less often aspirin (47.6% vs. 55.1%, P = 0.01), coronary revascularization (11.8% vs. 16.2%, P < 0.01), or device therapy (0.9% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.03). After median follow-up of 2 years, risk of all-cause mortality (iHF: HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.83–1.29 and pHF: HR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.79–1.12), cardiovascular mortality (iHF: HR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.71–1.24 and pHF: HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.71–1.10), and HF mortality (iHF: HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.34–1.90 and pHF: HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.43–1.29) were similar for patients with and without BC in the iHF and pHF groups.ConclusionRisk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in HF patients did not differ by BC status. Differences in pre-existing myocardial infarction and HF treatment among pHF patients with and without BC may suggest differences in pathogenesis of HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hedayati et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Heart failure and breast cancer (n=14,998). Breast cancer vs. Heart failure patients without breast cancer was evaluated on All-cause mortality in incident HF patients (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.83-1.29). Comorbid breast cancer did not significantly alter the risk of all-cause mortality among women with incident heart failure (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.83-1.29) or prevalent heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: