Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy of dolutegravir/lamivudine for maintenance treatment for people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV, PWH) and previous lamivudine resistance. METHODS: Open-label, single arm, multicentric clinical trial including virologically suppressed PWH with historical lamivudine resistance (confirmed by genotypic testing or suspected based on clinical history), no integrase resistance and CD4+ >200 cells/mm3 whose antiretroviral therapy (ART) was changed to dolutegravir/lamivudine if the M184V/I mutation was not detected in baseline proviral DNA population sequencing. Proviral DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) was retrospectively performed in baseline samples. Primary endpoint was proportion of participants with huma immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA viral load (VL) ≥50 copies/mL at 48 weeks in the intention-to-treat-exposed (ITT-e) population using the Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm. RESULTS: In total, 121 participants enrolled, 114 with a prior genotype with M184V/I, mean virological suppression of 9 years. And 24 (19.8%) had the M184V/I in baseline proviral DNA NGS (>5% threshold). At 48 weeks, 4 participants had a VL ≥50 copies/mL (3.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: ·.9%-8.2%, FDA-Snapshot ITT-e): 1 confirmed virologic withdrawal, 1 precautionary virologic withdrawal, and 2 discontinued from study treatment for other reasons with last VL ≥50 copies/mL; none had M184V/I in baseline proviral DNA NGS, and there was no emergent integrase resistance. Also, 90.1% participants (109/121) had a VL <50 copies/mL (95% CI: 83.3%-94.8%), and there were no data for 6.6% (8/121 participants) at 48 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: After excluding lamivudine mutations in proviral DNA by population sequencing, dolutegravir/lamivudine effectively maintained virological suppression in PWH with CD4+ >200 cells/mm3 and history of lamivudine resistance. Notably, no treatment-emergent resistance was observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buckley et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: