Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study finds perceived discrimination positively associates with metabolic syndrome in individuals with overweight and obesity, highlighting cardiometabolic risks of bias.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined characteristics of discrimination among participants with overweight and obesity, including discrimination attributions (i.e., attributed to weight and/or other personal characteristics) and discrimination frequency across settings (everyday life or medical settings), and their associations with metabolic syndrome. METHOD: self-reported their experiences of discrimination and contributed biomarker data used to determine metabolic syndrome. Participants identified personal characteristics perceived as reasons for discrimination (e.g., weight, gender, age, race). In cross-sectional analyses, multiple logistic regression models examined how discrimination attributions (weight and/or other personal characteristics) as well as frequency of everyday discrimination and discrimination in medical settings were associated with metabolic syndrome. RESULTS: = 1.09, 95% CI [1.04, 1.13]) were positively associated with metabolic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate the importance of assessing the burden of weight discrimination, including how multiple discrimination attributions and frequency of discrimination across settings may be associated with cardiometabolic health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leite et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: