Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 23, 2026Selcuk Journal of Agricultural and Food SciencesOpen Access

Field-Scale Spatial Modeling of Soil Properties in the Harran Plain Using IDW and Auxiliary Variable-Based Co-Kriging

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

HÖHalime ÖztürkFKFredric M. KaplanMEMehmet Ali Eminoğlu

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Spatial modeling study reveals Co-Kriging improves field-scale soil property prediction over inverse distance weighting, suggesting enhanced precision for site-specific fertilization.

Key Points

  • To evaluate and model the field-scale spatial variability of soil physical and chemical properties using deterministic and multivariate geostatistical interpolation methods.
  • Collected 54 surface soil samples (0–30 cm depth) across a 30-decare agricultural area in the Harran Plain using a 25 × 25 m grid design.
  • Analyzed soil physical characteristics (clay, silt, sand) and chemical properties (pH, electrical conductivity, lime, organic matter, available phosphorus).
  • Compared spatial interpolation accuracy between Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) and Co-Kriging (COK) utilizing electrical conductivity and lime as auxiliary variables.
  • Co-Kriging reduced RMSE relative to IDW for organic matter (from 0.34% to 0.33%) and available phosphorus (from 0.67 to 0.60 kg da⁻¹).
  • Available phosphorus exhibited the largest predictive enhancement, achieving a 10.44% RMSE reduction when incorporating lime as a correlated auxiliary variable.
  • Spatial distribution mapping demonstrated pronounced field-scale heterogeneity in clay, lime, organic matter, and phosphorus, identifying discrete zones for site-specific nutrient management.

Cite This Study

Öztürk et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8aad667677a34114445943https://doi.org/10.15316/selcukjafsci.1747599
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A two-step soil modeling approach by integrating pedological classification in digital mapping with non-stationary geostatistics2024
  2. 2Spatial variability of soil properties in Kiltie watershed, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Northwestern, Ethiopia2026
  3. 3Spatial variability of soil physicochemical properties in Soybean - Wheat belts in Vertisols of central India2024
  4. 4Spatial Assessment of Soil Properties in an Agricultural Basin - A Case Study: The Kiremitli Stream Basin (Keşan, Edirne)2026
  5. 5Digital Mapping of Soil Physicochemical Properties forSustainable Irrigation Management in a Semi-Arid Region of Central Mexico2026