Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial demonstrates improved coping, emotion regulation, and mental health in children with dyslexia following a socio-emotional program, indicating durable psychological benefits.
BACKGROUND: Children with dyslexia are at elevated risk of mental health difficulties, both internalizing (emotional) and externalizing (behavioural) problems. Clever Kids is a nine-week socio-emotional well-being programme developed specifically to support upper primary school children with dyslexia. AIMS: We conducted a pre-registered randomized-controlled trial to test the efficacy of Clever Kids. METHOD: = 10.19 years, 54% female) with clinically diagnosed dyslexia took part in the trial. Children were randomized to either attend Clever Kids (n = 38) or to a wait-list control condition (n = 40). Coping skills, emotion regulation, self-esteem, perseverance, assertiveness, as well as mental health (internalizing and externalizing symptoms) were measured at pre-programme, post-programme and at three-month follow-up using well-validated measures. RESULTS: The predicted interactions between intervention condition and time were significant for six outcomes. Attending Clever Kids was associated with significant improvements in child-reported coping, emotion regulation, academic and social self-esteem, as well as parent-reported anxiety and depression. Effects were all maintained at three-month follow-up. Unexpectedly, being assigned to the wait-list condition was associated with improvements in perseverance at follow-up assessment. For all other outcomes, interactions between intervention condition and time were non-significant. CONCLUSION: Clever Kids appears to be a promising programme for supporting socio-emotional well-being of children with dyslexia. Future research should consider incorporating caregivers more explicitly into the programme and alternative delivery modes, which could expand the reach of the programme.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boyes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: