Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 23, 2026Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental EpidemiologyOpen Access

Biomonitoring-based exposure assessment of phthalate and non-phthalate plasticizers: methodological insights from a 7-day consecutive sampling case study in Korea

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JKJinhyun KwonJHJin-Yeong HeoALAram Lee

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Consecutive sampling study reveals temporal variability and dietary exposure routes of alternative plasticizers in adults, highlighting toxicokinetics for accurate exposure estimation.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the temporal variability of plasticizer metabolites in consecutively collected urine samples and estimate exposure levels using toxicokinetic reverse dosimetry modeling.
  • Quantified 20 metabolites of six plasticizer compounds (DiNP, DiDP, DEHA, DEHTP, DINCH, and TOTM) across 218 urine samples collected over 7 consecutive days from 6 adults in Korea.
  • Calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Spearman correlations between first morning voids and daily average concentrations to evaluate biomarker temporal reproducibility.
  • Combined time-activity diaries with toxicokinetic models to reconstruct daily intake levels under intermittent versus continuous ingestion scenarios.
  • Metabolites of DiNP, DEHA, and DEHTP were detected in >70% of samples, with first morning voids correlating moderately with daily averages (Spearman's ρ = 0.34–0.62, p ≤ 0.05).
  • Overall ICCs ranged from 0.16 to 0.73, with carboxylated metabolites demonstrating fair-to-good reproducibility for DiNP, DEHA, and DINCH (ICC = 0.57–0.68) and the hydroxylated metabolite showing highest stability for DEHTP (ICC = 0.62).
  • Processed food intake was identified as the primary exposure route, with toxicokinetic modeling under intermittent ingestion yielding lower and more realistic intake estimates than continuous exposure assumptions.

Cite This Study

Kwon et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8aade47677a3411444657ahttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-026-00963-7
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A robust and validated method for the determination of 21 urinary metabolites of 15 plasticizers, including phthalates, DEHTP, and DINCH, by online SPE and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry2026
  2. 2Human Biomonitoring for Phthalate Exposure in Plastic Industries Worker2024
  3. 3Phthalates and Alternative Plasticizers in Duplicated Diet Samples from Korea2025
  4. 4Phthalate exposure in Korea: Environmental contamination, human biomonitoring, health effects, and regulatory responses2026
  5. 5Phthalate and Nonphthalate Plasticizer Exposure among Children of Korea, Thailand, Indonesia, and Bangladesh: Occurrences and Risk Comparison.2025 · 15 citations