Theoretical study demonstrates emergence of spacetime geometry and Standard Model gauge symmetries from a single integer parameter, suggesting an axiomatic foundation for fundamental physics.
This paper organizes how far geometry, symmetry, statistics, and readout structure can be derived from an axiomatic framework whose only external parameter is a single discrete integer N. The central axiom is a complex zero closure Σ x_n^2 = 0 with x_n complex. Indefinite metric signature, curvature radius, the negative sign of the time axis, and null-cone structure all arise as real-form displays of unobservable complex axes of the same quadratic form, rather than as separate postulates. A finite-order axiom U^N = I yields cyclic groups, cyclotomic eigenvalues, and Born-type squared weights; a simplex-consistency condition converts the relational data into distance geometry and chain complexes; a self-consistency fixed-point condition selects stabilizer subgroups. On the six-register reading, the complex zero closure leaves exactly five complex degrees of freedom (dim C^6 - 1 = 5); preserving a Hermitian 3+2 decomposition and removing the redundant global phase yields S(U(3) x U(2)), isomorphic to [SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1)]/Z_6, the faithful global gauge group of the Standard Model, as a conditional derivation. A refined internal reading Q^2 = Q_1^2 + Q_2^2 + Q_3^2 provides a second route connecting to SU(4) and Pati-Salam-type structures via Spin(6) ≅ SU(4), and the projective zero set of the M = 6 closure is the complex quadric Q^4 in CP^5, linking the framework to known accidental isomorphisms of six-dimensional orthogonal groups. The paper explicitly separates rigorously derived results, self-hypothesis results established in the author's three referenced prior papers, and the remaining open problems: the self-consistent selection rule among readout sectors, general Riemannian dynamics, local gauge dynamics, chirality/hypercharge/anomaly cancellation, and the selection rule for N itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noriaki Kihara (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: