Geodetic evaluation demonstrates high accuracy for BDS-3 B1C/B2a coordinate transfer across 21 long baselines, indicating modernized signals effectively support spatial reference frames.
High-precision long-baseline coordinate transfer is essential for maintaining spatial reference frames, and the modernized multi-frequency signals of BDS-3 provide new opportunities for this task. However, existing long-baseline network solutions still rely mainly on legacy frequency combinations, and quantitative evidence for pure new-frequency BDS-3 combinations in large-scale coordinate transfer remains limited. This study evaluates the applicability of BDS-3 high- and low-frequency signal combinations for long-baseline position datum transfer and investigates frequency-combination selection. Seven continuous stations were used to form 21 long baselines. Five dual-frequency schemes were tested, including four BDS-3 combinations, namely B1I/B3I, B1I/B2a, B1C/B2a, and B1C/B3I, and one GPS reference combination, L1/L5. Double-differenced ionosphere-free baseline processing and three-dimensional constrained network adjustment were applied. Performance was assessed using carrier-phase precision, normalized root mean square (NRMS), baseline vector quality, and point-transfer differences. The results show that the BDS-3 B1C/B2a new-frequency combination achieved the best overall consistency among the BDS-3 schemes, with an average high-frequency carrier-phase precision of 6.3 mm, a mean NRMS of 0.23, millimeter-level baseline vector formal-error RMS, and a 19.7 mm point difference at the unknown station DCMS. Given that the evaluation is based on seven consecutive days of observations, the long-term applicability of the proposed strategy requires further validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: