Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Expert guidance outlines ethical standards for peer reviewers, highlighting the necessity of confidentiality, unbiased evaluation, and responsible artificial intelligence use.
Trust is essential in peer reviewing, requiring confidentiality, unbiased assessments, and professional conduct. Reviewers must navigate potential conflicts of interest, maintain respectful communication, and handle new artificial intelligence technologies carefully. Upholding these ethical responsibilities enhances the credibility of scholarly publishing and fosters trust among authors, editors, and the academic community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leslie H. Nicoll (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: