Key result
Clinical laboratory-confirmed influenza was independently associated with higher odds of receiving antiviral treatment (AOR 3.05), though overall antiviral use among hospitalized older adults remained extremely low at 2.2%.
Observational (n=1,753)
Yes
Odds Ratio: 3.05 (95% CI 1.07–8.71)
Absolute Event Rate: 26.3% vs 4.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
Antiviral use remains low among older adults hospitalized with acute respiratory illness, even when influenza is confirmed by clinical testing.
Persistently low antiviral use in hospitalized older adults; leaves open optimal strategies to improve testing-guided prescribing.
OBJECTIVE: To describe antiviral use among older, hospitalized adults during six influenza seasons (2006-2012) in Davidson County, Tennessee, USA. METHODS: Among adults ≥50 years old hospitalized with symptoms of respiratory illness or non-localizing fever, we collected information on provider-initiated influenza testing and nasal/throat swabs for influenza by RT-PCR in a research laboratory, and calculated the proportion treated with antivirals. RESULTS: We enrolled 1753 adults hospitalized with acute respiratory illness. Only 26% (457/1753) of enrolled patients had provider-initiated influenza testing. Thirty-eight patients had a positive clinical laboratory test, representing 2.2% of total patients and 8.3% of tested patients. Among the 38 subjects with clinical laboratory-confirmed influenza, 26.3% received antivirals compared to only 4.5% of those with negative clinical influenza tests and 0.7% of those not tested (p<0.001). There were 125 (7.1%) patients who tested positive for influenza in the research laboratory. Of those with research laboratory-confirmed influenza, 0.9%, 2.7%, and 2.8% received antivirals (p=.046) during pre-pandemic, pandemic, and post-pandemic influenza seasons, respectively. Both research laboratory-confirmed influenza (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.04 95%CI 1.26-7.35) and clinical laboratory-confirmed influenza (AOR 3.05, 95%CI 1.07-8.71) were independently associated with antiviral treatment. Severity of disease, presence of a high-risk condition, and symptom duration were not associated with antiviral use. CONCLUSIONS: In urban Tennessee, antiviral use was low in patients recognized to have influenza by the provider as well as those unrecognized to have influenza. The use of antivirals remained low despite recommendations to treat all hospitalized patients with confirmed or suspected influenza.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindegren et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Acute respiratory illness or non-localizing fever (n=1,753). Clinical laboratory-confirmed influenza vs. Negative clinical influenza test was evaluated on Receipt of antiviral treatment (AOR 3.05, 95% CI 1.07-8.71, p=<0.001). Clinical laboratory-confirmed influenza was independently associated with higher odds of receiving antiviral treatment (AOR 3.05), though overall antiviral use among hospitalized older adults remained extremely low at 2.2%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: