Key result
Tape measurement of aortic length introduces substantial bias in obese patients, favoring calliper use.
Why the study?
Tape measurement of aortic length for cfPWV may be biased by body contours, especially abdominal obesity, potentially affecting arterial stiffness assessment in children and adolescents.
Does tape measurement of aortic length introduce bias in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity calculation compared to calliper measurement in obese children and adolescents?
Cross-Sectional (n=154)
Does tape measurement of aortic length introduce bias in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity calculation compared to calliper measurement in obese children and adolescents?
Effect estimate: β=96.9 (95% CI 75.3-118.5)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Tape measurement of aortic length overestimates carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in obese children and adolescents due to abdominal contours, emphasizing the need for calliper measurements.
May bias cfPWV estimates in obese youth; leaves open need for outcome validation of calliper use.
The recommendation for carotid—femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) is to use a calliper to measure the aortic length as a straight line. In adults, it has been shown that tape follows the body contours potentially making the distance longer — ultimately a higher cfPWV — interpreted as a higher aortic stiffness. Our objective was to investigate to what extent a tape measurement is influenced by abdominal obesity in children and adolescents. In a cross-sectional design, 100 obese patients with age 10–18 years were compared to 50 healthy control individuals. CfPWV was measured by applanation tonometry. The aortic length was determined with tape and a calliper (distance-tape and distance-calliper). The bias of the tape measurements was calculated as distance-tape minus distance-calliper. The bias of the tape measurements (mean ± SD) was significant in both the obese (D 14.6 ±11.2 mm, P < 0.0001) and the control group (Δ 5.7 ± 5.8 mm, P < 0.0001), and showed a linear relationship with waist-height ratio in the obese group (obese: β=96.9, CI: 75.3–118.5, P < 0.0001). Likewise, cfPWV was significantly higher when tape was used for the distance measurements in both groups (P values <0.0001). In multiple regression, however, cfPWV for both tape and calliper were significantly lower in the obese compared to the control group (P values <0.01). The bias of the tape measurements was related to the degree of abdominal obesity. Our results emphasize the importance of the use of a calliper when evaluating cfPWV in obese children and adolescents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hvidt et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Abdominal obesity (n=154). Tape measurement of aortic length vs. Calliper measurement of aortic length was evaluated on Linear relationship between the bias of tape measurements (distance-tape minus distance-calliper) and waist-height ratio in the obese group (β=96.9, 95% CI 75.3-118.5, p=<0.0001). Tape measurement of aortic length introduced a significant bias that correlated linearly with waist-height ratio in obese patients (β=96.9, P < 0.0001), emphasizing the need to use a calliper in this population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: