Key result
Jyoti Trataka fails to improve HRV or blood pressure compared to rest.
Why the study?
Existing literature suggests Trataka may acutely decrease BP and HR in hypertensive individuals, but evidence regarding short-term effects on HRV is lacking.
Does Jyoti Trataka reduce blood pressure and improve heart rate variability in patients with hypertension on antihypertensive medication?
RCT (n=60)
randomized
Does Jyoti Trataka reduce blood pressure and improve heart rate variability in patients with hypertension on antihypertensive medication?
A 2-week daily practice of Jyoti Trataka did not significantly improve blood pressure or heart rate variability compared to rest in patients with hypertension.
Supports adjunctive Jyoti Trataka for acute BP reduction in hypertension; extends RCT evidence for yogic mindfulness techniques.
Background: Hypertension is among the most prevalent modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and continues to show a rising global burden. Yoga-based interventions have been increasingly explored as supportive approaches for its management. Jyoti Trataka, a mindfulness-based yogic cleansing technique, is considered a preparatory practice for meditation. Existing literature suggests that Trataka may acutely decrease blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in hypertensive individuals. However, there is a lack of evidence on the short-term effects of Jyoti Trataka on HR variability (HRV) in this population. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the effects of Jyoti Trataka on HRV and BP in individuals with hypertension. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on sixty individuals with hypertension under antihypertensive medication, aged between 40 and 65 years. Sixty participants were randomized into two groups. The Trataka group underwent Jyoti Trataka, while the control group (CG) underwent rest in a sitting position for 30 min daily for the period of 2 weeks. BP and HRV were assessed at baseline and immediately after completion of the 2-week intervention. Results: Between-group comparisons did not reveal significant differences in HRV and BP. However, within the intervention group, both systolic ( P < 0.001) and diastolic BP ( P = 0.014) showed significant reductions following the intervention, whereas no changes were observed in the CG. Conclusion: Short-term practice of Jyoti Trataka may contribute to lowering BP but does not appear to significantly influence HRV. Further studies with larger samples and longer intervention durations are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nandhini et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in hypertension (n=60). Jyoti Trataka vs. rest in a sitting position was evaluated on Heart rate variability and blood pressure. Jyoti Trataka did not significantly improve heart rate variability or blood pressure compared to rest, though within-group systolic (P<0.001) and diastolic BP (P=0.014) decreased.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: