Key result
Echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular performance showed poor correlation with hemodynamic indexes (LVSWI), with correlation coefficients ranging from -0.62 to 0.22.
Why the study?
Is there a correlation between hemodynamic (LVSWI) and echocardiographic (FAC, RWMSI) indexes of left ventricular performance in cardiac surgery patients?
Observational (n=84)
No
Is there a correlation between hemodynamic (LVSWI) and echocardiographic (FAC, RWMSI) indexes of left ventricular performance in cardiac surgery patients?
There is a significant discrepancy and limited relationship between hemodynamic (pulmonary artery catheter) and echocardiographic (transesophageal echocardiography) evaluations of left ventricular performance in cardiac surgery patients.
Echocardiographic and hemodynamic LV indexes should not be considered interchangeable in cardiac surgery; leaves open their relative value for guiding care or predicting outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To compare hemodynamic and echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular performance. DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis of four clinical trials. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Cardiac surgery patients. INTERVENTION: Left ventricular performance was evaluated using left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) calculated from the pulmonary artery catheter and both fractional area change and regional wall motion score index (RWMSI) measured from transesophageal echocardiography. Measures of left ventricular performance were obtained before and after bypass (group 1, n = 30), during acute increase and decrease in preload (group 2, n = 14), after administration of inhaled prostacyclin or placebo in patients with pulmonary hypertension (group 3, n = 20), and in hemodynamically unstable patients in the intensive care unit at admission and at 2 and 4 hrs (group 4, n = 20). MAIN RESULTS: A total of 186 simultaneous LVSWI, fractional area change, and RWMSI were analyzed and compared. Patients with RWMSI <1.3 had a LVSWI of 23.4 +/- 10.3 g.m.m compared with 18.4 +/- 7.2 g.m.m in those with RWMSI >1.3 (p =.0349). Subdividing fractional area change into three different groups (> or =50%, 25% to 49%, and < or =24%), the corresponding values of LVSWI were 22.3 +/- 9.7 g.m.m, 22.2 +/- 10.8 g.m.m, and 17.7 +/- 5.5 g.m.m, respectively (p =.5114). Correlations between LVSWI and RWMSI changes ranged from -0.28 to 0.16 (p values from.31 to.94). Correlations between LVSWI and fractional area change changes ranged from -0.62 to 0.22 (p values from.07 to.95). CONCLUSION: There is a significant discrepancy and limited relationship between the hemodynamic and echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bouchard et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Cardiac surgery and hemodynamic instability (n=84). Echocardiographic indexes (fractional area change and RWMSI) vs. Hemodynamic indexes (LVSWI) was evaluated on Correlation between hemodynamic and echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular performance. Echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular performance showed poor correlation with hemodynamic indexes (LVSWI), with correlation coefficients ranging from -0.62 to 0.22.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: