Why the study?
Does thrombolytic therapy induce platelet surface activation in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Does thrombolytic therapy induce platelet surface activation in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction is associated with transient platelet activation (GP IIb-IIIa) peaking at 3 days, which may contribute to a prothrombotic state despite aspirin and heparin use.
We report the detection of activated GP IIb-IIIa complexes on platelets of patients undergoing thrombolytic therapy after acute myocardial infarction. Protocols were established for the monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): VH10, anti-P-selectin, a marker of platelet secretion; 9F9 and F26, two anti-RIBS (receptor-induced binding sites) mAbs specific for fibrinogen (Fg) bound to the GP IIb-IIIa receptor. Of ten patients studied: two were treated with streptokinase, four with APSAC (anisoylated plasminogen-streptokinase activator complex), and three with rt-PA. Platelets were tested on at least five occasions in the week following therapy. The percentage of platelets positive with 9F9 was often high, and reached a maximum within three days. By this time, plasma Fg levels, which fell during fibrinolysis, had begun to return to normal. Levels of activated platelets had fallen to baseline after 7 days. PAC-1, a mAb which binds directly to the activated GP IIb-IIIa complex, confirmed the results with 9F9, but F26 was a less sensitive probe. Binding of the anti-P-selectin mAb (VH10) was low, showing that little secretion had occurred. A concentration-dependent inhibition of 9F9 binding by RGDW peptide, a competitive inhibitor for Fg on GP IIb-IIIa, confirmed that Fg (or epitope-containing degradation products) were being located by the antibody. The activation of GP IIb-IIIa occurred despite the patients receiving aspirin and heparin. Thus platelets of some fibrinolytic patients have an increased tendency for surface activation within the first 72 h after treatment, a finding which would be compatible with an increased thrombotic tendency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bihour et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: