Key result
Localized high-grade Gleason 8 or 9 prostate cancer did not alter plasma PCSK9, ANGPTL3, Lp(a), or lipid profiles compared to matched at-risk controls.
Why the study?
Prostate cancer requires abundant lipids for development, but whether lipid-modifying factors such as PCSK9, ANGPTL3, and Lp(a) vary in men with prostate cancer had not been reported.
Case-Control (n=70)
No
Circulating lipid profiles, PCSK9, ANGPTL3, and Lp(a) levels do not significantly differ between men with localized high-grade prostate cancer and matched at-risk controls, though localized prostate cancer alters the correlation dynamics between PCSK9, LDL, and PSA.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support PCSK9, ANGPTL3, or Lp(a) as prostate cancer biomarkers; leaves open their prognostic value in longitudinal studies.
BACKGROUND: Some cancers have been found to require abundant supplies of lipids for their development. One example is prostate cancer (PCa). To date, lipid-modifying factors, such as proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), angiopoietin-like 3 protein (ANGPTL3), and lipoprotein(a) or Lp(a), have not been reported in men with PCa. The present study aimed to verify whether plasma levels of these lipid-related proteins vary in men with PCa compared to at-risk but cancer-free men. METHODS: Plasma samples from 35 men with locally advanced PCa Gleason 8 and 9 versus 35 men at risk of PCa were selected as cases and controls. Blood samples were paired according to age and BMI. Apolipoprotein B100 (Apo B), Lp(a), and lipid profiles were measured on an analytical platform (Roche Cobas). PCSK9 and ANGPTL3 levels were determined by ELISA. RESULTS: No significant change in lipids and related factors levels was observed between men with localized PCa Gleason 8 or 9 and matched controls. A correlation between ANGPTL3 and HDL levels was only confirmed in controls (ρ = 0.54, p = 0.0009). PCSK9 was inversely associated with PSA levels in the entire cohort (ρ = -0.31, p < 0.01), suggesting that factors influencing PCSK9 could also influence PSA levels. In controls only, PSA levels were correlated with LDL, Apo B, non-HDL, total cholesterol, and triglycerides (all ρ coefficients ≥ 0.35, all p-values < 0.05). PCSK9 was correlated to LDL in PCa men, but the relationship was unexpectedly found to be inverse. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, lipid profiles, PCSK9, ANGPTL3, and Lp(a) levels did not change in men diagnosed with locally advanced Gleason 8 or 9 PCa compared to at-risk but cancer-free men. The present data suggest a complex interplay between PCSK9, PSA, and the lipid profile in localized PCa.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chong et al. (2025) conducted a case-control in Localized high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason 8 or 9) and prostate cancer risk (n=70). Localized high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason 8 or 9) vs. Age- and BMI-matched men at risk for prostate cancer (elevated PSA or positive family history) who remained cancer-free for at least 3.2 years was evaluated on Plasma levels of PCSK9 (ng/mL), ANGPTL3 (ng/mL), Lp(a) (nmol/L), and lipid profile (p=0.58). Localized high-grade Gleason 8 or 9 prostate cancer did not alter plasma PCSK9, ANGPTL3, Lp(a), or lipid profiles compared to matched at-risk controls.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: