Key result
Support from a male friend attenuated blood pressure reactivity to acute stress, whereas support from a male stranger or female friend augmented reactivity.
Why the study?
Does the intimacy, sex, and type of social support affect cardiovascular reactivity to acute psychological stress in healthy young women?
Does the intimacy, sex, and type of social support affect cardiovascular reactivity to acute psychological stress in healthy young women?
The intimacy and sex of a social supporter interact to significantly influence cardiovascular reactivity to acute psychological stress in young women.
Support effects on BP reactivity may vary by supporter characteristics; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Exaggerated cardiovascular reactions to psychological stress are considered a risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity. Social support may reduce such risk by attenuating cardiovascular reactivity to stress. PURPOSE: To examine the effects of three independent social support variables and their interaction on cardiovascular reactivity to acute stress. The variables were stranger or friend presence, active supportive or passive presence, and male or female presence. METHODS: Cardiovascular reactions to mental arithmetic stress were measured in 112 healthy young women tested in one of eight distinct independent conditions: active supportive male friend; active supportive female friend; passive male friend; passive female friend; active supportive male stranger; active supportive female stranger, passive male stranger; and passive female stranger. RESULTS: Support from a friend rather than a stranger was associated with attenuated blood pressure reactivity, but only when the supporter was a male friend. Support from a male stranger or female friend was associated with augmented blood pressure reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: This interaction between the intimacy and sex of the supporter on cardiovascular reactivity extends the findings of previous laboratory studies of social support and can, to an extent, be interpreted in terms of the Social Comparison Theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phillips et al. (2009) studied Healthy (n=112). Social support (friend vs stranger, active vs passive, male vs female) vs. Alternative social support conditions was evaluated on Cardiovascular reactions to mental arithmetic stress. Support from a male friend attenuated blood pressure reactivity to acute stress, whereas support from a male stranger or female friend augmented reactivity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: