Key result
Routine use of a two-dose primary vaccination course increased the proportion of 6 to 18-month-old cattle with protective antibody titres against foot-and-mouth disease from 51% to 66% compared to a single-dose course.
Why the study?
Does a two-dose primary course of FMD vaccine improve population immunity compared to a single-dose primary course in Turkish cattle?
Does a two-dose primary course of FMD vaccine improve population immunity compared to a single-dose primary course in Turkish cattle?
Absolute Event Rate: 66% vs 51%
Biannual mass vaccination of cattle with a single-dose primary course leaves significant immunity gaps, which can be partially mitigated in young cattle by using a two-dose primary course.
May narrow immunity gaps in young cattle; leaves open optimal dosing for national FMD programs.
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in Turkey is controlled using biannual mass vaccination of cattle. However, vaccine protection is undermined by population turnover and declining immunity. A dynamic model of the Turkish cattle population was created. Assuming biannual mass vaccination with a single-dose primary course, vaccine history was calculated for the simulated population (number of doses and time since last vaccination). This was used to estimate population immunity. Six months after the last round of vaccination almost half the cattle aged < 24 months remain unvaccinated. Only 50% of all cattle would have received > 1 vaccine dose in their life with the last dose given ≤ 6 months ago. Five months after the last round of vaccination two-thirds of cattle would have low antibody titres (< 70% protection threshold). Giving a two-dose primary vaccination course reduces the proportion of 6-12 month old cattle with low titres by 20-30%. Biannual mass vaccination of cattle leaves significant immunity gaps and over-reliance on vaccine protection should be avoided. Using more effective vaccines and vaccination strategies will increase population immunity, however, the extent to which FMD can be controlled by vaccination alone without effective biosecurity remains uncertain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knight-Jones et al. (2016) studied Foot-and-mouth disease (n=135,453). Two-dose primary vaccination course vs. Single-dose primary vaccination course was evaluated on Proportion of cattle aged 6 to <18 months with predicted titres above the 70% protection threshold. Routine use of a two-dose primary vaccination course increased the proportion of 6 to 18-month-old cattle with protective antibody titres against foot-and-mouth disease from 51% to 66% compared to a single-dose course.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: