Key result
Enalapril, but not imidapril, significantly reduced forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (p=0.017) and forced vital capacity (p=0.018), though neither altered the capsaicin cough threshold.
Why the study?
Do enalapril and imidapril alter the capsaicin cough threshold and spirometry parameters in healthy volunteers?
RCT (n=14)
Double-blind
Randomized crossover
Do enalapril and imidapril alter the capsaicin cough threshold and spirometry parameters in healthy volunteers?
p-value: p=0.017 and 0.018
Enalapril, but not imidapril, significantly reduced FEV1 and FVC in healthy volunteers, though neither altered the capsaicin cough threshold.
Indicates agent-specific ACE inhibitor effects on spirometry independent of cough sensitivity; challenges class-wide assumptions for clinical and research consideration.
Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are highly effective, welltolerated drugs, but are associated with respiratory adverse effects such as cough and wheezing. Objectives: In this double-blind, randomized, two-way crossover study, the effects of two angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, enalapril and imidapril, in the capsaicin cough challenge test and spirometry parameters were investigated. Methods: The study involved two sequential 21-day periods separated by a 7-day washout period. In each period, volunteers received a once-daily oral dose of placebo during the first 7 days, imidapril 5 mg or enalapril 10 mg from days 8 to 14, and imidapril 10 mg or enalapril 20 mg from days 15 to 21. Cough challenge was performed at baseline and at the end of each week of treatment. Spirometry was performed before and immediately after the capsaicin challenge. Fourteen healthy subjects were enrolled, but one was withdrawn while taking enalapril due to dry cough. Results: Neither enalapril nor imidapril significantly altered the capsaicin cough threshold. A small but significant reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec and forced vital capacity was demonstrated after treatment with enalapril (p = 0.017 and p = 0.018, respectively), but not with imidapril. Capsaicin cough challenge was not associated with bronchospasm. Conclusion: Studies in asthmatics are needed to assess the clinical relevance of these data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silveira et al. (2004) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers (n=14). Enalapril and imidapril vs. Placebo was evaluated on Capsaicin cough threshold and spirometry parameters (FEV1 and FVC) (p=0.017 and 0.018). Enalapril, but not imidapril, significantly reduced forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (p=0.017) and forced vital capacity (p=0.018), though neither altered the capsaicin cough threshold.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: