Key result
A single shot of adductor canal block significantly improved 6-week postoperative WOMAC scores (28.87 vs 30.77, p=0.034) compared to continuous epidural analgesia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.
Why the study?
Total knee arthroplasty is highly painful, prompting a comparison of single shot adductor canal block versus continuous epidural analgesia for analgesia, motor involvement, muscle strength, and rehabilitation.
Does a single shot of adductor canal block improve postoperative recovery and analgesia compared to continuous epidural analgesia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty?
RCT (n=60)
Block randomization
No
Does a single shot of adductor canal block improve postoperative recovery and analgesia compared to continuous epidural analgesia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty?
Absolute Event Rate: 28.87% vs 30.77%
p-value: p=0.034
A single shot of adductor canal block provides better functional recovery, earlier mobilization, and less urinary retention compared to continuous epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty.
Single-shot adductor canal block may match epidural analgesia with less motor block after TKA; leaves open need for larger RCTs.
Introduction – Total knee arthroplasty is one of the most painful procedures. In this study we intended to compare two analgesic modalities i.e. single shot of Adductor canal block & Continuous epidural analgesia in terms of good post-operative analgesia, minimal motor involvement, good post-operative muscle strength thus allowing faster rehabilitation and recovery thereby improving the final outcome of TKR in long term. Material and method- A total of 60 patients were enrolled, 30 in each group. Group A received Standard General anesthesia & postoperative analgesia with a single shot of adductor canal block with 20cc of 0.25% ropivacaine. Group B received Combined spinal-epidural block & postoperative analgesia was maintained on continuous epidural infusion in the form of a mixture of 0.125% ropivacaine & fentanyl(2microgram/cc) at the rate of 6ml/hour. Result- Group B patients required a greater number of rescue analgesic doses in comparison to Group A patients. The majority of the patients in Group A had early postoperative mobilization in comparison to Group B (p=0.003). Mean preoperative and 6-week postoperative WOMAC scores showed that difference was statistically significant (p=0.034), showing a significantly lower 6-week postoperative WOMAC score in Group A in comparison to Group B. Conclusion – Our study gives us a conclusion that the post-surgical Single Shot of the adductor canal block is a better post-operative analgesic modality when compared with continuous epidural analgesia post-surgically in terms of better pain relief, good post-operative muscle strength, early mobilization of the patient, higher patient acceptability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garg et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Osteoarthritis of the knee (n=60). Single shot of adductor canal block vs. Continuous epidural analgesia was evaluated on 6-week postoperative WOMAC score (p=0.034). A single shot of adductor canal block significantly improved 6-week postoperative WOMAC scores (28.87 vs 30.77, p=0.034) compared to continuous epidural analgesia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: