Key result
Prophylactic ephedrine or ondansetron had no significant effect on maternal blood pressure versus placebo, but significantly reduced the need for intraoperative atropine (5% and 7.5% vs 32.5%).
Why the study?
Intraoperative hypotension is a common complication after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section, and existing preventive measures have not been completely effective.
Does prophylactic intravenous ephedrine or ondansetron improve intraoperative hemodynamic stability in pregnant patients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia?
RCT (n=120)
Single-blind
Randomly divided into three equal groups
No
Does prophylactic intravenous ephedrine or ondansetron improve intraoperative hemodynamic stability in pregnant patients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia?
Prophylactic ephedrine or ondansetron during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery does not significantly affect maternal blood pressure compared to placebo, but both reduce the need for atropine, and ondansetron reduces nausea and vomiting.
May inform strategies to prevent post-spinal hypotension in cesarean delivery; leaves open need for confirmatory RCTs.
Background Intra-operative hypotension is a common complication after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section due to sympathetic block and pooling of blood in the lower limbs by the effect of local anesthetic agent, this complication could be problematic for both the anesthesiologist and the surgeon which may increase perioperative morbidity of the parturient, many preventive measurements had been tried to prevent it but none of them were completely effective Objectives Comparison between intravenous ephedrine and ondansetron for intraoperative hemodynamic stability and frequency of vasopressor use in the cesarean section under spinal anesthesia Methods After Kurdistan Board for medical Specialties ethical committee approval a 120 consented parturients involved in this study, they were prepared for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, ASA=II(American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II), age between 18-45 year old. They were randomly divided into three groups equally, group (N) received 10ml normal saline; (group E) received 10mg IV ephedrine ; (group O ) received 8mg IV ondansetron immediately after spinal anesthesia, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, nausea and vomiting monitored perioperatively, Apgar score (Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration) of the fetus and frequency of using vasopressor also recorded. Results One hundred twenty (120) term, singletons pregnant patient underwent spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section included in this study, there was no significant difference found between groups in term of blood pressure but those who received ephedrine have lesser incidence of bradycardia and needs less amount of vasopressor use also ondansetron group has less incidence of bradycardia Conclusion Prophylactic ephedrine or ondansetron is given for spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean delivery have no significant effect on maternal blood pressure, ephedrine reduced the number of patients who require vasoconstrictor and atropine, ondansetron reduces the need for atropine during operation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baram et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (n=120). Ephedrine or Ondansetron vs. Normal saline was evaluated on Maternal blood pressure and pulse rate from spinal block to delivery. Prophylactic ephedrine or ondansetron had no significant effect on maternal blood pressure versus placebo, but significantly reduced the need for intraoperative atropine (5% and 7.5% vs 32.5%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: