Key result
Rapid diagnostic tests for influenza demonstrate high specificity (>97%) but moderate sensitivity (approximately 75% compared to culture), with performance varying by specimen type and patient age.
Why the study?
What are the sensitivity and specificity of currently licensed rapid diagnostic tests for influenza A and B?
What are the sensitivity and specificity of currently licensed rapid diagnostic tests for influenza A and B?
This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of the diagnostic performance of various rapid tests for influenza, highlighting their utility in clinical settings for timely antiviral management.
May support ruling in influenza at point of care; leaves open optimization of sensitivity by age and specimen type.
In high risk patients such as in eldery, newborns and immunosuppressed subjects, a timely diagnosis of influenza is required for the most appropriate antiviral strategy in order to avoid severe secondary respiratory complications and viral spreading. Influenza is preventable by vaccination and chemoprophylaxis and is treatable by specific antiviral indications. The need for a timely diagnosis has led to the introduction of numerous rapid diagnostic tests.These are mostly antigen detection test giving results within 30 minutes, a clinically relevant time-frame to complement with the use of antiviral medications or chemoprophylaxis strategy. When evaluating performances of rapid test for influenza viruses, it is important to consider the type and quality of specimen to be tested, as well as sensitivity and specificity of the assays. Nasal/nasopharyngeal swabs are the most frequently submitted specimens, but nasal/nasopharingeal aspirates and washs can improve the diagnostic sensitivity of the test. Only some rapid assays can be successful used with broncoalveolar washings. In this review,we evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility and feasibility of the most currently licensed rapid tests for influenza virus A and B. A flow-chart for the laboratory diagnosis of influenza with rapid test in combination with confirmatory test is proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allice et al. (2009) conducted a review in Influenza. Rapid diagnostic tests for influenza vs. Viral culture and molecular methods was evaluated on Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Rapid diagnostic tests for influenza demonstrate high specificity (>97%) but moderate sensitivity (approximately 75% compared to culture), with performance varying by specimen type and patient age.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: