Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Traditional assumptions about vessel circularity and red cell velocity proportionality can lead to significant errors in in vivo hemodynamic calculations, which can be mitigated by using mass conservation principles.
Microscopic images of blood flow through individual capillary segments and divergent capillary bifurcations in cremaster muscle of golden hamster were videotaped, and the data from the videotapes (projected vessel image width and individual red cell velocities) were used in two ways to evaluate blood flow rate. The first method assumes 1) that the vessel lumen is circular with a diameter equal to the projected image width and 2) that the blood average velocity is proportional to the average red cell velocity. The second method makes neither of these assumptions but relies only on the principle of mass conservation. It is demonstrated that the two assumptions of the first method can lead to significant errors in hemodynamic relationships deduced from in vivo data. Although the second method cannot independently give absolute values of average velocity at one vessel location, it can give absolute values of the ratio of blood flow rates through two (or more) vascular lumina.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cokelet et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: