Long-Term Outcome of Elderly Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing a Tailored Interventional Treatment Using Frailty-Based Management: Beyond the Five-Year Horizon

Background: Elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) need individualized decision-making in their management in order to benefit in terms of survival and improvement of quality of life. Frailty, a common condition in elderly patients, needs to be considered when weighing treatment options. Aim: We aimed to evaluate outcomes including survival and functional parameters according to disability criteria at six years of follow-up in an older population treated for severe AS using a frailty-based management. Methods: We evaluated data derived from a pilot clinical project involving elderly patients with severe AS referred to a tailored management based on classification by Fried’s score into pre-frail, early frail, and frail and a multidimensional geriatric assessment. A Frailty, Inflammation, Malnutrition, and Sarcopenia (FIMS) score was used to predict the risk of mortality at six years of follow-up. Functional status was evaluated by telephonic interview. Results: At six years of follow-up, we found a survival rate of 40%. It was higher in the pre-frail patients (long rank < 0.001) and in the patients who underwent TAVR treatment (long rank < 0.001). The cut-off FIMS score value of ≥1.28 was an independent determinant associated with a higher risk of mortality at six years of follow-up (HR 2.91; CI 95% 1.7–5.1; p-value 0.001). We found a moderate increase of disability levels, malnutrition status, comorbidities, and number of drugs, but none of them self-reported advanced NYHA class III–IV heart failure. Conclusion: An accurate clinical–instrumental and functional geriatric evaluation in an elderly population with AS is required for a non-futile interventional treatment in terms of survival and functional status even in long-term follow-up.