Key result
Severe frailty predicts ~5-fold greater risk of 12-month composite adverse outcomes after TAVR.
Why the study?
The optimal approach for frailty assessment in routine practice among elderly patients undergoing TAVR remains uncertain.
Does severe frailty predict adverse clinical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing TAVR?
Cohort (n=73)
No
Does severe frailty predict adverse clinical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing TAVR?
Odds Ratio: 5.44 (95% CI 1.68–7.52)
p-value: p=0.024
A simple three-component frailty score based on albumin, hemoglobin, and ADL dependence strongly predicts 12-month adverse outcomes in elderly patients undergoing TAVR.
May aid risk stratification in elderly TAVR patients; hypothesis-generating for interventions pending prospective validation.
Objective: Frailty is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of outcomes in elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).However, the optimal approach for frailty assessment in routine practice remains uncertain.Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center study including elderly patients (≥60 years, consistent with WHO definitions for developing countries) with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR.Frailty status was assessed using three routinely available clinical indicators: hypoalbuminemia, anemia, and dependence in activities of daily living (ADL).Frailty severity was defined by the number of abnormal indicators (0-3).The primary endpoint was a composite of procedural failure, major complications, and all-cause mortality at 1, 6, and 12 months.Results: Seventy-three patients were included.Composite adverse outcomes occurred in 34.3%, 37.0%, and 38.4% at 1, 6, and 12 months.Severe frailty (three indicators) was associated with significantly higher event rates.Severe frailty remained an independent predictor of 12-month composite outcomes (OR 5.44; 95% CI 1.68-7.52).Conclusion: A simple three-component frailty score based on albumin, hemoglobin, and ADL dependence effectively identifies high-risk elderly TAVR candidates.Incorporating this frailty assessment into preprocedural evaluation may support better risk stratification and clinical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Minh et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (n=73). Severe frailty (three-component score) vs. Non-frail (0 abnormal indicators) was evaluated on Composite of procedural failure, major complications, and all-cause mortality at 12 months (OR 5.44, 95% CI 1.68-7.52, p=0.024). Severe frailty, defined by hypoalbuminemia, anemia, and ADL dependence, independently predicted a higher risk of 12-month composite adverse outcomes (OR 5.44) in elderly patients after TAVR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: