Why the study?
Does long-term anticoagulation with warfarin cause significant bleeding in real-world patients treated for secondary VTE prevention?
Does long-term anticoagulation with warfarin cause significant bleeding in real-world patients treated for secondary VTE prevention?
Real-world patients on long-term warfarin for secondary VTE prevention experience higher rates of significant bleeding than typically anticipated from closely controlled trials.
Elevated real-world bleeding rates with long-term warfarin for secondary VTE prevention warrant caution; leaves open optimal strategies pending randomized comparisons.
The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) must be weighed against the risk of bleeding in deciding to keep patients on extended anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Most of the studies of risk of bleeding on VKAs are randomized controlled trials of highly selected patients followed for less than 1 year. We sought to determine the rate of bleeding in 'real world' patients on long-term anticoagulation with VKAs for VTE. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients monitored at our anticoagulation clinic who were treated with prolonged anticoagulation (>1 year) for secondary VTE prevention to assess the incidence of significant bleeding in this population. We found that most of our patients had serious comorbidities, including diabetes, cancer and solid-organ transplantation. The overall rate of bleeding was 10 episodes per 100 person-years, with major bleeding 5.2 episodes per 100 person-years. The rate of significant bleeding while on long-term warfarin may be higher than what is anticipated based on outcomes from closely controlled trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: