Voltage‐Guided and Non‐Voltage‐Guided Superior Vena Cava Isolation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND: In addition to the pulmonary vein, the superior vena cava (SVC) is an important focus of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, SVC isolation may cause serious complications, and appropriate settings and techniques for SVC isolation are lacking. METHODS: This study enrolled 86 consecutive patients with AF who underwent SVC isolation. Voltage mapping using a multi-electrode catheter and ablation were performed under the guidance of an electro-anatomical mapping system. The lines encircling the SVC were divided into eight anatomic segments on the SVC geometry, and each segment was subjected to voltage-guided (VG) ablation in decreasing order of voltage (starting from the segment with the highest voltage). Non-VG (NVG) ablation was performed anatomically from the anterior wall toward the septum with one-round cautery. RESULTS: VASc score 2 [1, 3], 58 paroxysmal AF) with AF were included for ablation. Electrical SVC isolation was successfully achieved in all patients. The length of the myocardial sleeves, as measured from the SVC-RA junction to the end of the local signal, was 37 [28, 45] mm. Major axis of the RA-SVC junction was 15 [13, 17] and minor axis of the RA-SVC junction was 11 [9, 13]. The number of ablation points with VG SVC isolation was fewer than that for NVG SVC isolation (8 [5, 11.5] vs. 11.5 [8.8, 13.3]; p = 0.001). The procedure time of VG SVC isolation was greater than that of NVG SVC isolation (259 s [154, 379] vs. 167 s [115, 222]; p = 0.012). There were no significant differences in the complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: VG SVC isolation reduced the number of ablation points compared with NVG SVC isolation.