Key result
Poor preoperative functional status is linked to ~62% higher cardiovascular event risk after EVAR.
Why the study?
The association between preoperative ECOG functional performance status and adverse cardiovascular events, vascular events, and mortality after EVAR and TEVAR required characterization.
Does poor preoperative functional status (ECOG 3 or 4) increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in patients undergoing EVAR and TEVAR?
Cohort (n=25,325)
Yes
Does poor preoperative functional status (ECOG 3 or 4) increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in patients undergoing EVAR and TEVAR?
Odds Ratio: 1.62 (95% CI 1.09–2.41)
Poor preoperative functional status (ECOG 3-4) is a significant predictor of adverse cardiovascular events and mortality following EVAR and TEVAR, highlighting its utility in risk stratification.
ECOG 3-4 status warrants caution in EVAR risk stratification; leaves open whether functional optimization improves outcomes.
Objective To characterize the association of preoperative functional performance status based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scoring with the risk of adverse cardiovascular events, vascular events, and mortality in patients undergoing EVAR and TEVAR. Methods Retrospective review of the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative, a large, multi-center, registry database was performed. All individuals undergoing EVAR ( n = 18,730) and TEVAR ( n = 6595) for non-ruptured aortic pathologies between 2014 and 2018 were eligible for analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association of pre-procedure ECOG functional performance status on risk of in-hospital adverse cardiovascular events, vascular events, and mortality. Results The number of operations complicated by adverse cardiovascular and vascular events was 480 (2.6%) and 190 (1.0%) for EVAR and 733 (11.1%) and 219 (3.3%) for TEVAR, respectively. There were 118 (0.6%) and 240 (3.6%) in-hospital deaths following EVAR and TEVAR, respectively. Patients with ECOG grades 3 or 4 undergoing EVAR were at increased risk of cardiovascular events (OR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.09, 2.41) and one-year mortality (HR = 2.62; 95% CI = 1.92, 3.57) compared to those with ECOG grade 0. Patients undergoing TEVAR with ECOG grade 3 or 4 were at increased risk for both inpatient death (OR = 2.77; 95% CI = 1.56, 4.9) and one-year mortality (HR = 3.27, 95% CI = 2.06, 5.21). ECOG status was not associated with an increased risk of adverse vascular events following either EVAR or TEVAR. Conclusions Poor preoperative functional status as assessed by ECOG score is associated with an increased risk of adverse postoperative cardiovascular events following EVAR and a higher mortality risk following both EVAR and TEVAR. Functional status assessment may be useful for risk stratification and determining procedural candidacy prior to EVAR and TEVAR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nadeswaran et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Non-ruptured aortic pathologies undergoing EVAR and TEVAR (n=25,325). Poor preoperative functional performance status (ECOG grades 3 or 4) vs. ECOG grade 0 was evaluated on In-hospital adverse cardiovascular events following EVAR (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.09-2.41). Poor preoperative functional status (ECOG grades 3 or 4) was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.09-2.41) and 1-year mortality (HR 2.62) after EVAR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: