Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article adopts a poststructural perspective to challenge the legitimization given to the exclusionary study of “the apparent” in memory. It is our contention that this approach neglects the development of a necessary and concurrent understanding of the contribution provided by the “less-apparent”—forgetting. It is argued that our preoccupation with the apparent obscures the relationship between memory and forgetting, resulting in a misguided, or at least a too-limited set of understandings associated with both. Through a deconstructive interdisciplinary approach, a new intelligibility of memory, grounded in an understanding of forgetting, is offered. From this perspective the consumer is cast as a constructive inquirer ( homo enquirean ) rather than as a retention bin ( homo estoreran ) to reveal what is being constructed and why. This change in perspective provides new avenues for research into consumer behavior and marketing strategy, which are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hill et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: