Muscle cell injury enhances halothane sensitivity in porcine biopsies, and halothane-induced changes in tetanic tension best distinguish normal from malignant hyperthermia-susceptible muscles.
Biopsy timing and viability may confound halothane sensitivity testing; leaves open standardization of MH diagnostic protocols.
A possible relationship between muscle cell injury or deterioration and enhanced halothane sensitivity was studied by monitoring mechanical responses of skeletal muscles from normal pigs and pigs susceptible to malignant hyperthermia (MH). Increased time postbiopsy and decreased maximum control tetanic tension both correlated significantly with enhanced sensitivity to halothane. In both normal and MH-susceptible (MHS) muscles, greater halothane sensitivity was observed in cut cell than in intact cell bundles and in low tetanic tension as compared to high tension preparations. Subsequent to halothane exposure, twitches of high tension (greater than or equal 1.75 kg . cm-2) intact bundles of both normal and MHS muscles were potentiated. Tetani of normal intact bundles were not altered, whereas those of MHS bundles were depressed after halothane exposure. Control twitch-to-tetanus ratios (twitch ratios) were higher in MHS (0.23) than in normal (0.12) intact bundles. According to discriminant analysis, the best distinction between normal and MHS muscles, either cut or intact, was obtained by comparing halothane-induced changes in tetanic tension and control twitch ratios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gallant et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: