Why the study?
Using non-EMS transportation for AMI patients may delay rapid identification and definitive treatment, prompting evaluation of the association between mode of transportation and door-to-balloon time.
Does ambulance transport reduce door-to-balloon time in patients with acute myocardial infarction compared to private vehicle transport?
Does ambulance transport reduce door-to-balloon time in patients with acute myocardial infarction compared to private vehicle transport?
Ambulance transport for AMI patients did not significantly reduce door-to-balloon time compared to private vehicle transport, despite shortening time to first ED physician contact.
Ambulance transport was not associated with shorter door-to-balloon times; leaves open optimal prehospital strategies in AMI.
Purpose: Time is critical when dealing with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients in the Emergency Department (ED), as 90 min is crucial for overall health. Using non-EMS transportation for critical patients, such as patients with acute myocardial infarction, to a hospital might delay the rapid identification of the underlying medical disease and initiating definitive treatment. We aim to evaluate the association between the mode of transportation and the D2B time in patients presenting at the ED with AMI. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with patients who presented at ED with AMI and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The participants were patients with confirmed AMI at the ED of King Abdullah Medical City (KAMC) from January 2019 to December 2019. Results: In total, 162 AMI patients were enrolled in the study and divided based on the method of transportation. Less than half (n=65, 40.1%) were transported with an ambulance and 97 (59.9%) patients with a private car. The door-to-balloon (D2B) time for the ambulance group was 93.6±38.31 minutes, and the private car group was 93.8±30.88 minutes. Conclusion: There was no statistical significance when comparing the D2B time between the private car group and the ambulance group (P = 0.1870). Finally, ambulance transport significantly shortened the time to first ED physician contact. However, it was not associated with shortened D2B time when compared to private vehicle transport.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alghamdi et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: