Why the study?
Prehospital interventions that shorten door-to-balloon time are available only via emergency ambulances, prompting evaluation of the impact of transport mode and related factors on door-to-balloon time.
Does arrival via emergency ambulance reduce door-to-balloon time in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Does arrival via emergency ambulance reduce door-to-balloon time in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Arrival via emergency ambulance significantly reduces door-to-balloon time for STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI compared to self-transport, highlighting the need for public education on EMS utilization.
Ambulance arrival was associated with shorter DTB in STEMI; supports EMS promotion efforts but leaves causal outcome benefits open.
Introduction: Early reperfusion of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) results in better outcomes. Interventions that have resulted in shorter door-to-balloon (DTB) time include prehospital cardiovascular laboratory activation and prehospital electrocardiogram (ECG) transmission, which are only available for patients who arrive via emergency ambulances. We assessed the impact of mode of transport on DTB time in a single tertiary institution and evaluated the factors that affected various components of DTB time. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using registry data of patients diagnosed with STEMI in the emergency department (ED) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We compared patients who arrived by emergency ambulances with those who came via their own transport. The primary study end point was DTB, defined as the earliest time a patient arrived in the ED to balloon inflation. As deidentified data was used, ethics review was waived. Results: A total of 321 patients were included for analysis after excluding 7 with missing data. The mean age was 61.4±11.4 years old with 49 (15.3%) females. Ninety-nine (30.8%) patients arrived by emergency ambulance. The median DTB time was shorter for patients arriving by ambulance versus own transport (52min, interquartile range [IQR] 45–61 vs 67min, IQR 59–74; P<0.001), with shorter door-to-ECG and door-to-activation time. Conclusion: Arrival via emergency ambulance was associated with a decreased DTB for STEMI patients compared to arriving via own transport. There is a need for public education to increase the usage of emergency ambulances for suspected heart attacks to improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: