Why the study?
Does mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients with mitral valve disease?
Does mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients with mitral valve disease?
Mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley prosthesis improves symptoms and resting hemodynamics, but exercise hemodynamics remain abnormal, highlighting the disconnect between symptomatic and objective hemodynamic improvement.
Supports symptomatic and resting hemodynamic gains after Björk-Shiley mitral replacement; leaves open effects on exercise capacity and durability.
Clinical and hemodynamic results have been evaluated 12--24 months after mitral valve replacement with the new Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis. After operation, most patients were improved symptomatically and were classified as I-II (N.Y.H.A.). No patient became worse. Hemodynamic status at rest showed significant reduction in pulmonary capillary venous pressure, pulmonary artial pressure and significant increase in cardiac output when compared with the preoperative values, but postoperative hemodynamic abnormalities remained. Exercise produced a rise in pressures in the pulmonary circuit and in cardiac output. The increase in cardiac output was less than expected from the increase in oxygen consumption, with a few exceptions. Apparently, there was no close relationship between the symptomatic improvement and the hemodynamic results. Thus, the present study points to the importance of hemodynamic data in the objective assessment of the results of cardiac surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nitter‐Hauge et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: