Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights the potential clinical risks and lack of generalizability of JNC-8 blood pressure goals for minority and underserved populations.
In the United States, hypertension is a significant medical problem that affects nearly 1 in 3 adults, causes thousands of deaths annually, and costs the nation billions of dollars annually for medical management in terms of hospitalisations, lost wages, and pharmacotherapy. The management guidelines of hypertension have greatly varied between different healthcare organisations including the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the Joint National Committee (JNC-7, 8). One of the points of contention is the generalisability of the guidelines to all individuals despite empirical evidence suggesting racial sensitivities to pharmacotherapy and high clinical adversities with elevations in blood pressure (BP). This manuscript will aim to review a brief history of the guidelines, the adjustment of the BP goals with pharmacotherapy for the management of hypertension, and discuss several socioeconomic factors attributing to higher clinical risks for certain minority racial groups susceptible to the new BPs goals for management under the JNC-8.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burns et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: