A single base mutation in the AT1a receptor gene promoter region of spontaneously hypertensive rats does not explain the overexpression of the AT1a receptor gene in these animals.
AT1a promoter mutation does not explain receptor overexpression in SHR; leaves open alternative mechanisms for hypertension research.
The angiotensin type 1a (AT1a) receptor gene is overexpressed in the brain and peripheral tissues of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). We examined whether there are mutations responsible for overexpression of the AT1a receptor gene in the SHR AT1a receptor promoter region. Genomic DNA was extracted from the livers of SHR and Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) of Izumo strain (SHR/Izm and WKY/Izm, respectively). Fragments of the AT1a receptor gene promoter region were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Amplified fragments were purified by agarose gel electrophoresis, and the purified fragments were cloned using pTBlue T-Vector. Sequence analysis identified one single base mutation unique to the SHR AT1a receptor gene promoter region when compared to that of WKY. The sequence of the mutation site in SHR was the same as that of Sprague Dawley rats. Using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay, we compared gel patterns formed by DNA-protein complexes using ds-oligonucleotides representing region-1624 to-1595 of the SHR and WKY AT1a receptor promoters. There were 3 major similar DNA-protein complexes against WKY and SHR oligonucleotides. In addition, the oligonucleotide bearing the SHR sequence produced an extra band. Promoter/luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that the promoter activity of SHR AT1a receptor promoters (-2050 to +57) was lower than that of WKY. These results suggest that there is one single mutation unique to the SHR AT1a receptor gene promoter region, but that the mutation is not responsible for overexpression of the AT1 a receptor gene in SHR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kambe et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: