Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
As we know, Ti 3+:Al 2 O 3 is a very famous crystal for ultrafast and tunable lasers. However, it also has disadvantages including small segregation coefficient and short fluorescence lifetime of Ti 3+ . For comparison, Ti-doped β-Ga 2 O 3 (Ti 3+:β-Ga 2 O 3 ) single crystals with good spectral properties have been designed and grown successfully by edge-defined film-fed growth method with larger segregation coefficient and longer fluorescence lifetime. The segregation coefficient of Ti 3+ ions in the Ti 3+:β-Ga 2 O 3 crystal was calculated to be 0.49, which was much larger than that in Ti 3+:Al 2 O 3 (0.2). The thermal conductivity of Ti 3+:β-Ga 2 O 3 crystal was measured to be 24.7 W/mK along the ⟨010⟩ direction at room temperature, which is very attractive as a laser crystal. Furthermore, the polarized absorption spectra and fluorescence spectra of Ti 3+:β-Ga 2 O 3 were measured and analyzed. The full width at half-maximum of the emission peak was as large as 140 nm. The fluorescence lifetime was up to 176 ± 5 μs, which was about 50 times longer than that of Ti 3+:Al 2 O 3 . All the properties indicate that Ti 3+:β-Ga 2 O 3 is a potential material for ultrafast and tunable laser applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mu et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: