Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual analysis demonstrates fragility in AI agent self-improvement mechanisms, suggesting guarded coevolution frameworks are necessary to prevent contagious memory failures.
Language-model agents can adapt through prompts, memories, skills, tools, routers, evaluators, and environments without changing model weights. This paper reconciles recent work on adaptive environments, harness continual learning, and the fragility of memory-based self-improvement. It argues that coevolution increases adaptive capacity but does not imply monotonic progress, and proposes a Guarded Agentic Coevolution framework separating candidate variation, local adaptation, contextual stability, governed transfer, and authorized reliance. The framework adds multi-run and task-order stress tests, typed memory applicability, contagion monitoring, quarantine, non-compensable preservation, receiver-specific transfer, and rollback. Applications to JustitIA and IntegridAI are structural proposals under eval-first status, not evidence of empirical product improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ignacio Adrián LERER (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: