Why the study?
Does off-pump CABG improve cardiac autonomic regulation and reduce postoperative arrhythmias compared to on-pump CABG in patients with 3-vessel stable coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=57)
Open-label
Alternating assignment
No
Does off-pump CABG improve cardiac autonomic regulation and reduce postoperative arrhythmias compared to on-pump CABG in patients with 3-vessel stable coronary artery disease?
Odds Ratio: 8.6 (95% CI 1.4–80.3)
Absolute Event Rate: 54% vs 13%
p-value: p=0.017
Off-pump CABG is associated with better preserved cardiac autonomic modulation and a significantly lower incidence of arrhythmic events at 7 days postoperatively compared to conventional on-pump CABG.
Off-pump CABG was associated with fewer early arrhythmias; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Altered autonomic regulation after cardiac operations precipitates cardiac arrhythmias, affects repolarization, and increases the risk of sudden cardiac death. We sought to clarify how the 2 different techniques of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), namely conventional CABG using cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump) and beating-heart CABG without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump), affect cardiac autonomic regulation and arrhythmic disturbances postoperatively. METHODS: We included 57 consecutive patients, 28 in the on-pump group and 29 in the off-pump group. The electro-cardiographic recordings were performed on the preoperative day and the fourth, seventh, and twenty-eighth day after operation. Fifteen-minute digital recordings were taken; one channel was used to record electrocardiogram and the other breathing. Detailed analyses of arrhythmia, heart rate, and heart rate variability indices were performed on respective days to assess sympathetic and parasympathetic modulation of the heart and relate it to detected arrhythmic disturbances. RESULTS: Total power, low-frequency power, which indicates baroreceptor-mediated sympathetic modulation, and high-frequency power, indicating parasympathetic vagal modulation, declined significantly in both groups after CABG (P < .001); however, 7 days after CABG, total and high-frequency power were better preserved in the off-pump group. Mean RR interval was longer in the off-pump group at 7 (P= .006) and 28 days (P= .008) after surgery. The total incidence of arrhythmic events was higher in the on-pump group on the seventh day (P = .017, adjusted odds ratio = 8.6, 95% confidence interval 1.4-80.3). CONCLUSIONS: The results show profound impairment of cardiac autonomic regulation after CABG, showing better preserved cardiac autonomic modulation 7 days after beating-heart revascularization. Evidence suggests that slower restoration of heart rate and increased incidence of arrhythmic events after CABG using cardiopulmonary bypass are the result not only of impaired cardiac autonomic regulation but also of the involvement of additional factors of nonautonomic origin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kališnik et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in 3-vessel stable coronary artery disease (n=57). On-pump CABG vs. Off-pump CABG was evaluated on Incidence of arrhythmic events on the seventh postoperative day (OR 8.6, 95% CI 1.4-80.3, p=0.017).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: