Key result
Psychological interventions added to cardiac rehabilitation are highlighted as a critical component to address the two-fold greater rates of morbidity and mortality in patients with psychological disorders.
Why the study?
Does the addition of psychological interventions to cardiac rehabilitation improve clinical and psychosocial outcomes in cardiac patients?
Does the addition of psychological interventions to cardiac rehabilitation improve clinical and psychosocial outcomes in cardiac patients?
The author advocates for network meta-analysis to better isolate the effects of specific cardiac rehabilitation components, such as psychological interventions, on patient outcomes.
Cardiac patients with psychological disorders suffer two times greater rates of morbidity and mortality on top of their distress, versus cardiac patients without. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) associations globally call for programmes to be comprehensive, including, most relevant here, delivery of interventions to promote patient’s psychosocial well-being to address this elevated risk. Albus et al.1 published a thoughtful meta-analysis in an earlier issue of this journal on the effect of the addition of psychological interventions to CR on clinical and psychosocial outcomes, adding to the now plethora of reviews in this area. As alluded to in the accompanying editorial by Pedersen and Doyle, network meta-analysis is a better approach to teasing apart the impact of the various core components of CR on outcomes. This way, we can account for all components delivered in both the intervention as well as comparison and/or usual care arms. This is particularly true given the...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grace et al. (2021) conducted an editorial in Cardiac patients with psychological disorders. Psychological interventions added to cardiac rehabilitation vs. Usual care or cardiac rehabilitation without psychological interventions was evaluated. Psychological interventions added to cardiac rehabilitation are highlighted as a critical component to address the two-fold greater rates of morbidity and mortality in patients with psychological disorders.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: