Key result
Among patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation, 31.5% exhibited high subclinical distress, which did not improve after completion and predicted adverse cardiac events.
Why the study?
Subclinical distress and psychological well-being in cardiac rehabilitation patients have relevant clinical implications but their changes over time and impact on cardiac outcomes are unclear.
Does cardiac rehabilitation improve clinical and subclinical distress, quality of life, and psychological well-being in patients?
Cohort (n=108)
Does cardiac rehabilitation improve clinical and subclinical distress, quality of life, and psychological well-being in patients?
While cardiac rehabilitation effectively reduces clinical psychological distress, a significant burden of subclinical distress often persists and predicts adverse cardiac events.
Persistent subclinical distress after CR may warrant monitoring; leaves open whether targeted interventions reduce cardiac events.
BACKGROUND: The literature has outlined positive effects of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on clinical psychological distress (DSM depression and anxiety) and quality of life (QoL). In cardiac settings, subclinical distress (subthreshold depressive and anxious symptomatology) and psychological well-being also showed relevant clinical implications. This research explored these psychological variables, their changes over time and cardiac course of CR patients. METHODS: Clinical and subclinical distress, QoL, and psychological well-being were assessed in 108 consecutive patients undergoing CR, at baseline and up to 12 months after the program's completion. RESULTS: Of all patients, 25.9 per cent showed high distress with a DSM diagnosis, 31.5 per cent high distress without a DSM diagnosis, and 42.6 per cent low distress. Comparing these subgroups, worse QoL and psychological well-being were significantly linked not only to clinical but also to subclinical distress. After CR completion, a significant reduction in DSM diagnoses was observed, whereas there were no positive effects on subclinical distress, QoL, and well-being, or when they initially occurred, they were not long lasting. Moreover, only the subgroup with high distress without a DSM diagnosis was at greater risk for adverse cardiac outcomes, showing worse scores on items of contentment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm data on clinical distress reduction after CR completion. However, a large amount of relevant subclinical distress remains and predicts adverse cardiac events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gostoli et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (n=108). Cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Clinical and subclinical distress, quality of life, and psychological well-being. Among patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation, 31.5% exhibited high subclinical distress, which did not improve after completion and predicted adverse cardiac events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: