Key result
A five-year intensive lifestyle and stress management program for women with CVD significantly reduced emergency visits and in-patient days (p<0.05) but did not affect sick leave rates.
Why the study?
Does a five-year intensive lifestyle and stress management programme reduce the use of hospital care and sickness absenteeism in younger women with cardiovascular disease?
RCT (n=130)
Does a five-year intensive lifestyle and stress management programme reduce the use of hospital care and sickness absenteeism in younger women with cardiovascular disease?
A five-year intensive lifestyle and stress management rehabilitation program significantly reduces emergency visits and in-patient days among younger women with cardiovascular disease, though it does not affect sick leave rates.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intensive lifestyle programs reduce hospital use in younger women with CVD; extends secondary prevention evidence but leaves sick leave unaffected.
AIMS: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the dominant diagnosis in in-patient care in Sweden and the third most common cause for long-term sick leave and disability pension. Women are higher consumers of health care than men and have higher frequencies of sickness absenteeism. The aim of this paper was to evaluate whether a five-year long rehabilitation programme for women with CVD affected the use of hospital care and sickness absenteeism. METHODS: 130 women below 65 years of age with CVD were randomized to either intervention (n = 69, mean age 52.4 years) with an intensive lifestyle programme (e.g. physical exercise, smoking cessation, dietary advice), including stress management or to standard care (n = 61, mean age 54.3 years). All patients went through baseline medical examinations, including self-administered questionnaires. This procedure was repeated yearly during the rehabilitation period. The frequency of cardiac-related healthcare use was followed via official registers. RESULTS: Emergency visits and number of in-patient days decreased significantly in the intervention group from year one to year five (p < 0.05) but remained unchanged in the control group. Scheduled doctor visits decreased significantly in both groups. There were no significant differences between groups regarding proportion of women on sick leave after one, three and five years. CONCLUSIONS: This extensive intervention programme reduced visits at emergency wards and numbers of in-patient days, which in the long run may have beneficial effects on public finances and the patient's quality of life. The study confirmed previous findings from interventions showing difficulties in influencing sick-leave rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andersson et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Cardiovascular disease (n=130). Intensive lifestyle programme including stress management vs. Standard care was evaluated on Emergency visits, number of in-patient days, and sickness absenteeism (p=<0.05). A five-year intensive lifestyle and stress management program for women with CVD significantly reduced emergency visits and in-patient days (p<0.05) but did not affect sick leave rates.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: