Why the study?
Does the EuroSCORE accurately predict mortality in Taiwanese patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery?
Does the EuroSCORE accurately predict mortality in Taiwanese patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery?
The EuroSCORE demonstrates acceptable validity for predicting mortality in Taiwanese patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, despite demographic differences from the original European validation cohort.
Supports EuroSCORE use for CABG mortality prediction in Taiwanese patients; extends European validation but leaves open need for prospective recalibration.
The applicability for Taiwanese cardiac surgery is unclear. The preliminary goal of our study was to evaluate the validity of EuroSCORE in coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). From January 1999 to January 2004, 801 consecutive adult patients who received primary or re-operative off- and on-pump CABG in our institute were collected. Both simple additive and logistic scores were calculated. Patients were categorized into low-risk group (simple additive score 0-2), medium-risk group (simple additive score 3-5), and high-risk group (simple additive score 6 plus). Mean age was 68.0+/-10.1 years. Patients aged 75 or more were 27.6%. Male-to-female ratio was 3.8:1. The mean simple additive and logistic scores of all patients were 5.0+/-3.5 and 8.0+/-11.9, respectively. The observed overall average mortality rate was 10.6%. There were 18.6% of patients in low-risk group, 40.0% in medium-risk group, and 41.4% in high-risk group. The mortality rate was 3.3% in low-risk group, 5.3% in medium-risk group, 19.0% in high-risk group. The area under the curve (c-index) was 0.75 for the simple additive score and 0.74 for the logistic score. Our results suggest that despite demographic differences, our study demonstrates preliminarily that EuroSCORE is valid in CABG for Taiwanese.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: