Key result
In patients hospitalized for acute heart failure, cimlanod at 6 μg/kg/min resulted in clinically relevant hypotension in 21% of patients versus 18% with placebo (RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.58-2.43).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to identify well-tolerated doses of the novel nitroxyl donor cimlanod and explore signals of efficacy in patients with acute heart failure.
Does cimlanod infusion increase the rate of clinically relevant hypotension compared to placebo in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure with LVEF ≤40%?
RCT (n=322)
Double-blind
1:1 in part I, 1:1:1 in part II
Does cimlanod infusion increase the rate of clinically relevant hypotension compared to placebo in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure with LVEF ≤40%?
Relative Risk: 1.15 (95% CI 0.58–2.43)
Absolute Event Rate: 21% vs 18%
In patients with acute heart failure, a 48-hour infusion of cimlanod at 6 μg/kg/min was reasonably well-tolerated and transiently reduced markers of congestion, though higher doses increased the risk of clinically relevant hypotension.
Cimlanod at 6 μg/kg/min does not increase clinically relevant hypotension; extends the safety profile for efficacy trials in acute HFrEF.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to identify well-tolerated doses of cimlanod in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). Secondary objectives were to identify signals of efficacy, including biomarkers, symptoms, and clinical events. BACKGROUND: Nitroxyl (HNO) donors have vasodilator, inotropic and lusitropic effects. Bristol-Myers Squibb-986231 (cimlanod) is an HNO donor being developed for acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS: This was a phase IIb, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 48-h treatment with cimlanod compared with placebo in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% hospitalized for AHF. In part I, patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to escalating doses of cimlanod or matching placebo. In part II, patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to either of the 2 highest tolerated doses of cimlanod from part I or placebo. The primary endpoint was the rate of clinically relevant hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or patients became symptomatic). RESULTS: In part I (n = 100), clinically relevant hypotension was more common with cimlanod than placebo (20% vs. 8%; relative risk [RR]: 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83 to 14.53). In part II (n = 222), the incidence of clinically relevant hypotension was 18% for placebo, 21% for cimlanod 6 μg/kg/min (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.58 to 2.43), and 35% for cimlanod 12 μg/kg/min (RR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.04 to 3.59). N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and bilirubin decreased during infusion of cimlanod treatment compared with placebo, but these differences did not persist after treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Cimlanod at a dose of 6 μg/kg/min was reasonably well-tolerated compared with placebo. Cimlanod reduced markers of congestion, but this did not persist beyond the treatment period. (Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of 48-Hour Infusions of HNO (Nitroxyl) Donor in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure [STANDUP AHF]; NCT03016325).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Felker et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Acute heart failure (n=322). Cimlanod vs. Placebo was evaluated on Clinically relevant hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or symptomatic) (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.58-2.43). In patients hospitalized for acute heart failure, cimlanod at 6 μg/kg/min resulted in clinically relevant hypotension in 21% of patients versus 18% with placebo (RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.58-2.43).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: