Key result
The ESC EORP-AF III Registry enrolled 8,306 adult patients with atrial fibrillation across 31 countries to assess contemporary management patterns and 1-year outcomes based on guideline adherence.
Why the study?
The registry aimed to identify contemporary AF management patterns, assess compliance and gaps regarding the 2016 ESC AF Guidelines, and evaluate 1-year outcomes comparing guideline-adherent versus non-adherent strategies.
Does guideline-adherent management improve 1-year outcomes in adult AF patients compared to non-adherent management?
Cohort (n=8,306)
Yes
Does guideline-adherent management improve 1-year outcomes in adult AF patients compared to non-adherent management?
The EORP-AF III Registry is a large, international prospective registry designed to assess contemporary AF management and the impact of guideline adherence on 1-year clinical outcomes.
Large AF registry data on guideline adherence warrant cautious interpretation; leaves open causal outcome benefits without randomized confirmation.
AIMS: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) EURObservational Research Programme (EORP)-Atrial Fibrillation (AF) III Registry aims to identify contemporary patterns in AF management in clinical practice, assess their compliance with the 2016 ESC AF Guidelines, identify major gaps in guideline implementation, characterize the clinical practice settings associated with good vs. poor guideline implementation and assess and compare the 1-year outcome of guideline-adherent vs. guideline non-adherent management strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive adult AF patients (n = 8306) were enrolled between 1 July 2018 and 15 July 2019, and individual patient data were prospectively collected across 192 centres and 31 participating countries during the 3-month enrolment period per centre. The Registry collected baseline and 1-year follow-up data in the eight main domains: patient demographic/enrolment setting, AF diagnosis/characterization, diagnostic assessment, stroke prevention treatments, arrhythmia-directed therapies, integrated AF management, major outcomes (death, non-fatal stroke or systemic embolic event, and non-fatal bleeding event), and the quality of life questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The EORP-AF III Registry is an international, prospective registry of care and outcomes of patients treated for AF, which will provide insights into the contemporary patterns in AF management, ESC AF Guidelines implementation in routine practice and barriers to optimal management of this highly prevalent arrhythmia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Potpara et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=8,306). Guideline-adherent management strategies vs. Guideline non-adherent management strategies was evaluated on 1-year outcome (death, non-fatal stroke or systemic embolic event, and non-fatal bleeding event). The ESC EORP-AF III Registry enrolled 8,306 adult patients with atrial fibrillation across 31 countries to assess contemporary management patterns and 1-year outcomes based on guideline adherence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: