Key result
Elevated baseline hsCRP prior to cardiac resynchronization therapy independently predicted a 2.39-fold increased risk of death or heart failure hospitalizations.
Why the study?
Does elevated baseline or follow-up hsCRP predict adverse clinical outcomes and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients with advanced heart failure undergoing CRT?
Cohort (n=232)
No
Does elevated baseline or follow-up hsCRP predict adverse clinical outcomes and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients with advanced heart failure undergoing CRT?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Elevated baseline hsCRP and persistently high hsCRP at 6 months independently predict adverse clinical outcomes and inferior left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients with advanced heart failure undergoing CRT.
BACKGROUND: The data on the prognostic values of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels in patients with advanced symptomatic heart failure (HF) receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are scarce. The aim of present study was to investigate the association of serum hsCRP levels with left ventricle reverse remodeling after six months of CRT as well as long-term outcome. METHODS: A total of 232 CRT patients were included. The assessment of hsCRP values, clinical status and echocardiographic data were performed at baseline and after six months of CRT. Long-term follow-up included all-cause mortality and hospitalizations for HF. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up periods of 31.3 ± 31.5 months, elevated hsCRP (> 3 mg/L) prior to CRT was associated with a significant 2.39-fold increase (P = 0.006) in the risk of death or HF hospitalizations. At 6-month follow-up, patients who responded to CRT showed significant reductions or maintained low in hsCRP levels (-0.5 ± 4.1 mg/L reduction) compared with non-responders (1.7 ± 6.1 mg/L increase, P = 0.018). Compared with patients in whom 6-month hsCRP levels were reduced or remained low, patients in whom 6-month hsCRP levels were increased or maintained high experienced a significantly higher risk of subsequent death or HF hospitalizations (Log-rank P < 0.001). The echocardiographic improvement was also better among patients in whom 6-month hsCRP levels were reduced or remained low compared to those in whom 6-month hsCRP levels were raised or maintained high. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrated that measurement of baseline and follow-up hsCRP levels may be useful as prognostic markers for timely potential risk stratification and subsequent appropriate treatment strategies in patients with advanced HF undergoing CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Chronic heart failure (n=232). Elevated baseline hsCRP (> 3 mg/L) vs. Low baseline hsCRP (≤ 3 mg/L) was evaluated on All-cause mortality, cardiac transplantation, or hospitalizations for decompensated HF (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.28-4.47, p=0.006). Elevated baseline hsCRP prior to cardiac resynchronization therapy independently predicted a 2.39-fold increased risk of death or heart failure hospitalizations.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: